Kukay wrote:That’s the thing why abortionists keep banging at the gongs , clanging the cymbals , beating the drums.... “ It’s my body ! It’s my choice ! “ .
There’s an element of Right of Privacy in abortion.
They inserted that Right of Privacy . In California that is ... not sure in other states .
A teenager can have an abortion without their parents’ consent .
Teenagers typically don’t have jobs . They don’t have their own health insurance .
It’s embarrassing to tell your parents that you’re pregnant .... and use the health insurance coverage of your parents to have an abortion.
So yeah ... teenagers don’t have to pay anything to have an abortion . It’s free.... in rich Democrat ( blue ) state and cities .
But not all cities in blue states can afford to give free abortion .
Anyway ..they love the secrecy of having an abortion without telling your parents /guardian.
They sweetened abortion by putting that Right of Privacy.
esperasave wrote:Kukay wrote:That’s the thing why abortionists keep banging at the gongs , clanging the cymbals , beating the drums.... “ It’s my body ! It’s my choice ! “ .
There’s an element of Right of Privacy in abortion.
They inserted that Right of Privacy . In California that is ... not sure in other states .
A teenager can have an abortion without their parents’ consent .
Teenagers typically don’t have jobs . They don’t have their own health insurance .
It’s embarrassing to tell your parents that you’re pregnant .... and use the health insurance coverage of your parents to have an abortion.
So yeah ... teenagers don’t have to pay anything to have an abortion . It’s free.... in rich Democrat ( blue ) state and cities .
But not all cities in blue states can afford to give free abortion .
Anyway ..they love the secrecy of having an abortion without telling your parents /guardian.
They sweetened abortion by putting that Right of Privacy.
Yes, they get the emotional excitement of being in Cloud 9 with sexual encounters but it's the TAX PAYERS money who are always suffering especially with The Pandemics and War that Prices of all commodoties are soaring high and yet, they can gain access to THE ABORTION CLINIC FOR FREE FROM PUBLIC FUNDS ANYTIME THEY WANT. That's not fair for all hard earner people. It's a Misuse of Funds.
esperasave wrote:Abortionist LIKES PHYSICAL PLEASURES AND DESIRES FROM SEXUAL ENCOUNTERS. THEY DONT LIKE THE CONSEQUENCES AND RESPONSIBILITY OF IT BUT AT THE EXPENSE OF PUBLIC FUNDS. THEY NEED TO BE EDUCATED SO THAT NO ONE IS IN HARM'S WAY. THE UNBORN CHILD IS THEIR SCAPEGOAT OR PAWN FROM THEIR NARCISSIST BEHAVIOR. They are double trouble maker with killing the UNBORN child and misuse of public funds. Avoiding Abortions could be done thru Sexual Education with regards to Human Sexuality FOR ALL TEENAGERS AND ALSO THOSE THAT APPEARS ignorant, confused about the issue.
esperasave wrote:Educate The Teenagers that Sex is not for Them but Time will come they'll realize it's Importance to Family Life with its Consequences and Responsibilities. The Power of Education is immensely A Strong Channel because The Teenagers would be guided to the Right direction whenever they face social issues and dilemma. Likewise, having vast knowledge and Awareness will give them The Opportunity to develop intelligent decision making in areas of critical situations.
Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:Educate The Teenagers that Sex is not for Them but Time will come they'll realize it's Importance to Family Life with its Consequences and Responsibilities. The Power of Education is immensely A Strong Channel because The Teenagers would be guided to the Right direction whenever they face social issues and dilemma. Likewise, having vast knowledge and Awareness will give them The Opportunity to develop intelligent decision making in areas of critical situations.
Kung magsalita ka naman ... as if hindi ka rin malibog like the teenagers.
Ang libog eh isinasa ayos yan ... lalo na pagka true love .
Just use contraception.
It’s simple as that .
I can tell hindi kapa nakakaranas ng ka sex mo eh true love kaya kung magsalita eh parang kung sinong kontrabidang mala Bella Flores Cherrie Gil na mother superior .
Ang mga naka sex mo eh pihadong mga panandaliang kamunduhan lang .
Just so you know ... there’s such as thing na true love na sex .
Si Juliet nga sa Romeo and Juliet eh just 13 years old .
Ang yes ... nag sex sina Romeo and Juliet and it was true love .
https://www.quora.com/How-old-is-Juliet ... and-Juliet
How old are Romeo and Juliet?
Ascertaining Juliet’s age is pretty simple. Shakespeare makes it quite obvious that she is 13 years old. Nurse and Lady Capulet comment on it several times in Act 1, scene 3:
LADY CAPULET. She's not fourteen.
NURSE. I'll lay fourteen of my teeth,--
And yet, to my teeth be it spoken, I have but four--
She is not fourteen. How long is it now
To Lammas-tide?
LADY CAPULET. A fortnight and odd days.
NURSE. Even or odd, of all days in the year,
Come Lammas-eve at night shall she be fourteen.
Susan and she--God rest all Christian souls!--
Were of an age: well, Susan is with God;
She was too good for me: but, as I said,
On Lammas-eve at night shall she be fourteen;
That shall she, marry; I remember it well.
In discussing her age with Paris, Lord Capulet claims:
My child is yet a stranger in the world;
She hath not seen the change of fourteen years,
Let two more summers wither in their pride,
I should point out that Shakespeare stole the plot for Romeo and Juliet. Have no concern. Shakespeare ripped off several stories for his plays. Everyone seems to have done so. The original source, The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet, was written nearly 30 years before Romeo and Juliet was written. That version has Juliet at 16 years old.
How old is Romeo? We have no idea. He is described as young. Lord Capulet calls him “Young Romeo” (I.5). He even goes on to say of Romeo:
And, to say truth, Verona brags of him
To be a virtuous and well-govern'd youth:
I would not for the wealth of all the town
Here in my house do him disparagement:
So Romeo is a youth and young. What does that get us? First, I would point out that a lot of people claim that Romeo is something of a pedophile. All you have to do is look up “Romeo pedophile” to find claims: romeo pedophile - Google Search.
Still, there is no evidence that Romeo is 18 or 23. Instead, since he’s described as a “youth,” and since he is apparently rather new to love, we might put him down at a far younger age. He could be Juliet’s age. Maybe he’s a year or so younger. In all likelihood, so that a Renaissance audience figured that the two were on an equal footing, I would just guess that Romeo is around the same age as Juliet, or maybe a year or two olde
esperasave wrote:Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:Educate The Teenagers that Sex is not for Them but Time will come they'll realize it's Importance to Family Life with its Consequences and Responsibilities. The Power of Education is immensely A Strong Channel because The Teenagers would be guided to the Right direction whenever they face social issues and dilemma. Likewise, having vast knowledge and Awareness will give them The Opportunity to develop intelligent decision making in areas of critical situations.
Kung magsalita ka naman ... as if hindi ka rin malibog like the teenagers.
Ang libog eh isinasa ayos yan ... lalo na pagka true love .
Just use contraception.
It’s simple as that .
I can tell hindi kapa nakakaranas ng ka sex mo eh true love kaya kung magsalita eh parang kung sinong kontrabidang mala Bella Flores Cherrie Gil na mother superior .
Ang mga naka sex mo eh pihadong mga panandaliang kamunduhan lang .
Just so you know ... there’s such as thing na true love na sex .
Si Juliet nga sa Romeo and Juliet eh just 13 years old .
Ang yes ... nag sex sina Romeo and Juliet and it was true love .
https://www.quora.com/How-old-is-Juliet ... and-Juliet
How old are Romeo and Juliet?
Ascertaining Juliet’s age is pretty simple. Shakespeare makes it quite obvious that she is 13 years old. Nurse and Lady Capulet comment on it several times in Act 1, scene 3:
LADY CAPULET. She's not fourteen.
NURSE. I'll lay fourteen of my teeth,--
And yet, to my teeth be it spoken, I have but four--
She is not fourteen. How long is it now
To Lammas-tide?
LADY CAPULET. A fortnight and odd days.
NURSE. Even or odd, of all days in the year,
Come Lammas-eve at night shall she be fourteen.
Susan and she--God rest all Christian souls!--
Were of an age: well, Susan is with God;
She was too good for me: but, as I said,
On Lammas-eve at night shall she be fourteen;
That shall she, marry; I remember it well.
In discussing her age with Paris, Lord Capulet claims:
My child is yet a stranger in the world;
She hath not seen the change of fourteen years,
Let two more summers wither in their pride,
I should point out that Shakespeare stole the plot for Romeo and Juliet. Have no concern. Shakespeare ripped off several stories for his plays. Everyone seems to have done so. The original source, The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet, was written nearly 30 years before Romeo and Juliet was written. That version has Juliet at 16 years old.
How old is Romeo? We have no idea. He is described as young. Lord Capulet calls him “Young Romeo” (I.5). He even goes on to say of Romeo:
And, to say truth, Verona brags of him
To be a virtuous and well-govern'd youth:
I would not for the wealth of all the town
Here in my house do him disparagement:
So Romeo is a youth and young. What does that get us? First, I would point out that a lot of people claim that Romeo is something of a pedophile. All you have to do is look up “Romeo pedophile” to find claims: romeo pedophile - Google Search.
Still, there is no evidence that Romeo is 18 or 23. Instead, since he’s described as a “youth,” and since he is apparently rather new to love, we might put him down at a far younger age. He could be Juliet’s age. Maybe he’s a year or so younger. In all likelihood, so that a Renaissance audience figured that the two were on an equal footing, I would just guess that Romeo is around the same age as Juliet, or maybe a year or two olde
Education is the best weapon about dealing with challenges on Human Sexuality so that the Teenagers won't be facing struggles with their BODIES. Teenagers are still growing and their knowledge is just limited. However, when they are more intelligent or smart enough, ABORTION COULD BE AVOIDED or other similar situation. Catholic preachings, parental guidance, School and Community Efforts would certainly help them develop a more nurturing environment. As what the saying goes, IT TAKES A VILLAGE TO RAISE A CHILD so precisely we need help with each other to solve this kind of issues affecting the whole community.
Prozac wrote:It is a great morning for unborn babies.
What a GREAT day to live in the US! Thank you AGAIN, Donald Trump, for appointing intelligent Judges who value
the lives of children.
And for pro-abortion zealots, why resort to murder when you are just living a wanton way of life? Your narrative"
This is my body anyway ... I can do anything I want as I please ..." is not in synch with Supreme Court's pro-life
refrain.
Abortion to save the life of the mother is acceptable, but resorting to abortion just because you are single and
have enjoyed a decadent and licentious sexual freedom, come on ... abortion is murder. If you don't want to get
pregnant ... why so reckless and so irresponsible.
Abortion is not a game ... so don't be thoughtless, incautious, and ill-advised! No matter what ... you're decision
will haunt you for as long as you live.
Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote:Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote:Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote: If you actually took the time to educate yourself, abortion has only been overturned on the federal level, but has been left on the state level to decide if it should be legal or not. Women can still perform abortion up to 24 weeks in blue (predominantly Democrat) states.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-25/ ... /101183262
What do you mean ONLY on the federal level ?
Abortion is now unconstitutional .
The federal government will not fund abortion .
Just imagine if you’re a pregnant teen ... without a job . Who will shoulder the expenses ?
So it all boils down to this : MONEY
Even in a Democrat state ( blue state ) like California ...not everything is free . The health care system is flawed .
There’s no universal health care system in America .
Only rich cities in California can afford free of everything... the so called sanctuary cities .
There’s 3 sources to get money to pay the health coverage bill in the US .
1. Federal government - using Medicare ... so scratch that . Medicare will not fund abortion.
2. State - in California they use Medical . Problem is ... Medical does not pay for everything .
3. City - only rich cities give supplemental health coverage .
This is just an example :
If your hospital bill is $ 5,000 ....you won’t get any money from the Federal government. California will only pay $3,000 .
The City of San Francisco will pay $2,000 .
The fact that abortion is now unconstitutional is a huge deal .
There’s no universal Heath Care system in America .
Even for a Democrat state ( blue state ) ... they have to find a way to make abortion free . They cannot use federal money to finance abortion.
So going back to my question ....
If you’re a pregnant teenager without a job ... who will pay for your abortion ?
If you’re a pregnant teen in Alabama . You have to tell your parents to give you money to go to Massachusetts to have an abortion. The federal government will not pay anything for your abortion . Massachusetts state will not pay for your abortion because you’re from Alabama .I don’t know if Boston is a sanctuary city ... if it’s not ... Boston will not pay for your abortion bill . Essentially if you’re a pregnant teen ... you need rich parents to get an abortion .
The fight for abortion is really about money .
Abortionists want money .
Abortionists want the government to pay for abortion .
Even Democrat states ( blue states ) have problem paying for abortion . Not all cities are rich enough to provide supplemental health coverage .
WRONG. Show me exactly in the US Constitution where it says it is constitutional. The reason why 6 SC justices overturned it because Roe vs. Wade was decided in a rush, and it was never constitutional to begin with. Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg thought that the case was made out of faulty decision.
1. The Right To Abortion, A Constitutional Right?
In short, there is no clear answer when it comes to whether or not the right to an abortion is a constitutional right. The right to an abortion is not mentioned anywhere in the US Constitution. The debate will likely continue for many years to come.
It is also worth noting that many people, including Justice Antonin Scalia, believe that the right to an abortion should not be protected under the Constitution. https://www.womenscenter.com/2022/04/ab ... nal-right/
2. Abortion is not a constitutional right according to a direct reading of the text of the Constitution, but it has been justified as such under the Fourth Amendment’s protection of privacy. In short, the constitutional right to abortion is found not in the Constitution itself, but in a loose reading of it as a “living document,” as “progressives” like to call it. https://www.hli.org/resources/abortion- ... man-right/
3. Legally speaking, the Supreme Court did not ban abortion. The Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson holding “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey must be overruled, and the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to the people and their elected representatives.” https://ktar.com/story/5123287/legally- ... -decision/
4. No, Abortion Isn't a Constitutional Right https://www.realclearpolitics.com/artic ... 0388.html#!
5. Supreme Court leak confirms Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s prescient warning about Roe v. Wade https://nypost.com/2022/05/04/supreme-c ... oe-v-wade/
Ha ha
Your googling skill is hilarious .
It’s so easy now to google stuff that abortion is unconstitutional because the judges already handed out their decision .
But before it wasn’t because of that freak’n Roe vs Wade .
And it’s pretty obvious you don’t know anything about legal matters .
The contention really is the INTERPRETATION of the laws ... and in this case the INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.
And US Supreme Court judge Brett Kavanaugh wrote in his decision that the US Constitution never protected nor trashed abortion .Simply put ... abortion was never part of the constitution.
That evil Roe vs Wade makes people think that abortion is constitutional but it was all thinly veiled .
Now that abortion is officially unconstitutional... they cannot ask the federal government for money to fund anything related to abortion .
And they cannot misappropriate funds and funnel money to support abortion . That’s against the law . Ha ha
Your blue states ( Democrat states ) have to find ways to support your abortion.
Not all blue states and cities are rich .... not everybody can finance abortion . That’s just the reality .
The federal government is the richest source of money... now you abortionists have a huge humongous gargantuan problem .
Ha ha
Dude, I am against abortion, so don't call me an abortionist.
AGAIN- Abortion IS AND HAS NEVER BEEN CONSTITUTIONAL. You know zero about how the US Constitution works, or how the SCOTUS interprets it. Also, you're talking from both sides of your mouth. I'm not sure whether you're pro-life or pro-choice, or whether or not you disagree with SCOTUS's decision to outlaw abortion on the federal level. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution outlines the enumerated powers and abortion is not there. Therefore, you go to the 9th and 10th Amendments to learn the process for allowing abortions or disallowing abortions in each state. SCOTUS originally overstepped its boundaries when it ruled on Roe back in 1973. The 10th Amendment is specific. What is not mentioned in Constitution shall be left to the states to decide. The Justices are there to rule on constitutionality of a case - not legislate from the bench. For whatever reason, way too many people like yourself are of the misguided understanding that the leaked court opinion outlaws abortion - it doesn't at all. It allows each state to either outlaw it or not. But I have to give you credit for stating that it's all about money. This is the reason why Planned Parenthood is panicking because they will no longer receive federal funding for abortions.
You’re not an abortionist ? .. then why are you bragging that Democrat states ( blue states ) can still perform abortion ?
It’s a liability for the blue states and blue cities to shoulder all the financial burden of abortion .
They want abortion for all including the poor and the teenagers ( in California, a teenager can have an abortion without their parents’ consent ) .... problem is ... instead of using the state money and city money to more important matters ...they will now pay for abortion without the help of the federal government.
America is now officially not pro abortion .
You can rant all you want about blue states being able to do abortion blah blah blah .... but the US government ( Federal government ) have nothing to do with abortion. The US government will not pay a single cent to abortion .
They want abortion ? These blue states have to PAY.... PAY .... PAY !!!
Bwahahahaha <== evil laughter.
That %£¥&#%*# Roe vs Wade make it as America is pro abortion.
It’s not .
The judges handed the verdict .... abortion is unconstitutional !
Roe vs Wade is garbage .
Abortion is garbage .
And stop piggy backing at the decision of the judges just because they already gave a verdict.
When Roe vs Wade was still in effect ... the constitutionality of abortion was a huge question mark .
FaruqHuda wrote:Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote:Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote:Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote: If you actually took the time to educate yourself, abortion has only been overturned on the federal level, but has been left on the state level to decide if it should be legal or not. Women can still perform abortion up to 24 weeks in blue (predominantly Democrat) states.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-25/ ... /101183262
What do you mean ONLY on the federal level ?
Abortion is now unconstitutional .
The federal government will not fund abortion .
Just imagine if you’re a pregnant teen ... without a job . Who will shoulder the expenses ?
So it all boils down to this : MONEY
Even in a Democrat state ( blue state ) like California ...not everything is free . The health care system is flawed .
There’s no universal health care system in America .
Only rich cities in California can afford free of everything... the so called sanctuary cities .
There’s 3 sources to get money to pay the health coverage bill in the US .
1. Federal government - using Medicare ... so scratch that . Medicare will not fund abortion.
2. State - in California they use Medical . Problem is ... Medical does not pay for everything .
3. City - only rich cities give supplemental health coverage .
This is just an example :
If your hospital bill is $ 5,000 ....you won’t get any money from the Federal government. California will only pay $3,000 .
The City of San Francisco will pay $2,000 .
The fact that abortion is now unconstitutional is a huge deal .
There’s no universal Heath Care system in America .
Even for a Democrat state ( blue state ) ... they have to find a way to make abortion free . They cannot use federal money to finance abortion.
So going back to my question ....
If you’re a pregnant teenager without a job ... who will pay for your abortion ?
If you’re a pregnant teen in Alabama . You have to tell your parents to give you money to go to Massachusetts to have an abortion. The federal government will not pay anything for your abortion . Massachusetts state will not pay for your abortion because you’re from Alabama .I don’t know if Boston is a sanctuary city ... if it’s not ... Boston will not pay for your abortion bill . Essentially if you’re a pregnant teen ... you need rich parents to get an abortion .
The fight for abortion is really about money .
Abortionists want money .
Abortionists want the government to pay for abortion .
Even Democrat states ( blue states ) have problem paying for abortion . Not all cities are rich enough to provide supplemental health coverage .
WRONG. Show me exactly in the US Constitution where it says it is constitutional. The reason why 6 SC justices overturned it because Roe vs. Wade was decided in a rush, and it was never constitutional to begin with. Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg thought that the case was made out of faulty decision.
1. The Right To Abortion, A Constitutional Right?
In short, there is no clear answer when it comes to whether or not the right to an abortion is a constitutional right. The right to an abortion is not mentioned anywhere in the US Constitution. The debate will likely continue for many years to come.
It is also worth noting that many people, including Justice Antonin Scalia, believe that the right to an abortion should not be protected under the Constitution. https://www.womenscenter.com/2022/04/ab ... nal-right/
2. Abortion is not a constitutional right according to a direct reading of the text of the Constitution, but it has been justified as such under the Fourth Amendment’s protection of privacy. In short, the constitutional right to abortion is found not in the Constitution itself, but in a loose reading of it as a “living document,” as “progressives” like to call it. https://www.hli.org/resources/abortion- ... man-right/
3. Legally speaking, the Supreme Court did not ban abortion. The Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson holding “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey must be overruled, and the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to the people and their elected representatives.” https://ktar.com/story/5123287/legally- ... -decision/
4. No, Abortion Isn't a Constitutional Right https://www.realclearpolitics.com/artic ... 0388.html#!
5. Supreme Court leak confirms Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s prescient warning about Roe v. Wade https://nypost.com/2022/05/04/supreme-c ... oe-v-wade/
Ha ha
Your googling skill is hilarious .
It’s so easy now to google stuff that abortion is unconstitutional because the judges already handed out their decision .
But before it wasn’t because of that freak’n Roe vs Wade .
And it’s pretty obvious you don’t know anything about legal matters .
The contention really is the INTERPRETATION of the laws ... and in this case the INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.
And US Supreme Court judge Brett Kavanaugh wrote in his decision that the US Constitution never protected nor trashed abortion .Simply put ... abortion was never part of the constitution.
That evil Roe vs Wade makes people think that abortion is constitutional but it was all thinly veiled .
Now that abortion is officially unconstitutional... they cannot ask the federal government for money to fund anything related to abortion .
And they cannot misappropriate funds and funnel money to support abortion . That’s against the law . Ha ha
Your blue states ( Democrat states ) have to find ways to support your abortion.
Not all blue states and cities are rich .... not everybody can finance abortion . That’s just the reality .
The federal government is the richest source of money... now you abortionists have a huge humongous gargantuan problem .
Ha ha
Dude, I am against abortion, so don't call me an abortionist.
AGAIN- Abortion IS AND HAS NEVER BEEN CONSTITUTIONAL. You know zero about how the US Constitution works, or how the SCOTUS interprets it. Also, you're talking from both sides of your mouth. I'm not sure whether you're pro-life or pro-choice, or whether or not you disagree with SCOTUS's decision to outlaw abortion on the federal level. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution outlines the enumerated powers and abortion is not there. Therefore, you go to the 9th and 10th Amendments to learn the process for allowing abortions or disallowing abortions in each state. SCOTUS originally overstepped its boundaries when it ruled on Roe back in 1973. The 10th Amendment is specific. What is not mentioned in Constitution shall be left to the states to decide. The Justices are there to rule on constitutionality of a case - not legislate from the bench. For whatever reason, way too many people like yourself are of the misguided understanding that the leaked court opinion outlaws abortion - it doesn't at all. It allows each state to either outlaw it or not. But I have to give you credit for stating that it's all about money. This is the reason why Planned Parenthood is panicking because they will no longer receive federal funding for abortions.
You’re not an abortionist ? .. then why are you bragging that Democrat states ( blue states ) can still perform abortion ?
It’s a liability for the blue states and blue cities to shoulder all the financial burden of abortion .
They want abortion for all including the poor and the teenagers ( in California, a teenager can have an abortion without their parents’ consent ) .... problem is ... instead of using the state money and city money to more important matters ...they will now pay for abortion without the help of the federal government.
America is now officially not pro abortion .
You can rant all you want about blue states being able to do abortion blah blah blah .... but the US government ( Federal government ) have nothing to do with abortion. The US government will not pay a single cent to abortion .
They want abortion ? These blue states have to PAY.... PAY .... PAY !!!
Bwahahahaha <== evil laughter.
That %£¥&#%*# Roe vs Wade make it as America is pro abortion.
It’s not .
The judges handed the verdict .... abortion is unconstitutional !
Roe vs Wade is garbage .
Abortion is garbage .
And stop piggy backing at the decision of the judges just because they already gave a verdict.
When Roe vs Wade was still in effect ... the constitutionality of abortion was a huge question mark .
Me bragging about Democrat states still allowing abortion? LOL. Where in the world did you get the notion that I'm an abortionist? I don't know what kind of weed you're smoking, but I specifically said "Dude, I am against abortion, so don't call me an abortionist." Reread my above statement. I think you're confused because it appears we seem to agree that abortion as what you said is "garbage."
ClubEarthMisso wrote:
esperasave wrote:ClubEarthMisso wrote:
Thats termination of pregnancy is due to medical reason for the mother would die which is widely accepted in our SOCIETY. But to terminate a pregnancy because you just wanted it is no way would be agreeable for everyone. It could raise alot of people's eyebrow and scratch their head. That's not inclusive to our Society. Not in The Catholic Church either. The Catholic Church is strongly defending life from Conception till Death. On the other hand, All Abortionist can live in HELL FOR FREE and do whatever to their bodies but on Planet Earth, No way Jose. People of The World rather The Universe would Raise Their Eyebrows. They're gonna Misuse The Government Funds intended for Important Projects to The Country's Infrastructures, Education, Healthcare,
Feeding Programs etc. This is a sad reality that after what they have done to their bodies but they want THE PEOPLE be responsible to its outcome.
chapfallen_guy wrote:I'm not ultra-Catholic but I believe in the sanctity of life. However, the US in its constitution upholds the separation of State and Religion. Americans have multi-cultural and religious beliefs so everyone is entitled to express their inalienable and unassailable constitutional right adherent to their own principles and personal choice.
Kukay wrote:Mga kupal yang mga baklang Democrats nayan .
Mga bakla na nga eh mga abortionists pa .
Pwe !
I know Democrats all too well .
Mangloloko ang mga yan .
Kunya kunyare eh pro minorities.... na pro illegal immigrants etc etc .
It’s a known fact na mas maraming pina deport na illegal aliens si Obama kesa kay Trump . Yes 2 terms si Obama at one term lang si Trump .... pero mas marami pareng pina deport si Obama kesa kay Trump during his first term .
The only reason why Democrats love illegal immigrants eh because it’s cheap labor .
Labs na labs ng California ang illegal aliens/illegal immigrants kase California is an agricultural state... they love illegal aliens working sa mga vineyards , sa fields .
The agricultural industry ng California will not survive without illegal aliens na super cheap labor.
If you will look at it closely ... it’s slavery all over again na super cheap labor .
Kayo wag maniwala na pro illegal aliens/illegal immigrants ang mga Democrats . They just want cheap labor .
Kamala Harris went to Guatemala and telling them not to come to the US.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57387350
Yang ba ang sinasabe nyong ang mga Democrats eh pro minorities.... na pro illegal immigrants ?
Pro minorities at pro illegal immigrants lang ang mga Democrats pagka its campaign time during election ....pagka naka upo na ang mga yan .. doon lumalabas ang mga tunay na kulay ng mga yan .
Majority of the Latinos voted for Trump .
And it’s no surprise kase Trump helped a lot of Latinos even before he became a president.
May hotels and other businesses si Trump sa Florida and Las Vegas , Nevada.... and he hired a lot of Latinos.
Hindi puro salita at pangako si Trump .
Marami shang tinulungan at tinutulungang Latinos .
He a certified at proven na pro Minorities.
I’m not in anyway saying that squeaky at pristine clean ang mga Republicans.... like I said notoriously na white supremacists ang mga hardcore Republicans... pero in terms sa kawalanghiyaan against minorities eh mas maraming ginawa ang mga democrats kesa sa republicans.
Numbers don’t lie .... mas marami talagang pina deport si Obama kesa kay Trump.
At pede ba ...hindi pa viable ang renewable energy like yang solar energy nayan .
Sobrang mahal magpa install ng solar panels . Not everyone can afford it .
Only the rich can have solar energy .
Hindi pa kayang suportahan ng solar energy ang ano mang state .
Heavily dependent paren ang each and every state sa fossil fuels ... sa gasolina ... sa oil .
Kaya wag maniwala sa mga Democrats na pro environment sila ... na sustainable at viable ang renewable energy ek ek nayan . It’s an empty promise .
It was really shocking when Hillary Clinton said during her presidential campaign that she will abolish coal mining and that she will replace it with solar energy , wind energy ek ek .
Walang basehan ang pinagsasabe nayun ni Hillary Clinton . Dependent paren hanggang ngayon ang America sa coal mining at sobrang dameng American families ang nag de depend sa coal mining .... solar energy/wind energy eh hindi pa viable and sustainable.
Nanloloko lang ang mga Democrats.m
Poster boy ang California ng mga Democrats ... pero wag ka .
The only reason that California is rich is because they heavily tax people and most especially the very rich .
At yung sinasabe nilang yung mga ultra rich lang ang tina target nila .... it’s a lie .
Kahit ordinaryong mga tao they are targeting na ih tax .
They alway put tax increase propositions sa ballot box .... para linis kunsensya sila na it’s the people who decided to increase the tax .... and they sugar coat these tax increase propositions para to get a yes vote ... na kunyare for the benefit of the poor ek ek . Pagka na pass na yun tax increase propositions don molang malalaman na it’s a scam ... it’s really just to increase the tax at super kapirangot na mabe benefit and the poor and needy .
Basta Democrat puro tax tax tax ... at tax increase , tax increase , tax increase ang alam .
And I’m not even exaggerating.
I wish I’m exaggerating but sadly I’m not .
Sobrang yaman na ng California pero ang mga Democrats eh tax paren ng tax .
The California economy eh the sixth largest economy in the world .
It’s like a country sa sobrang yaman ...tinalo pa ang ibang industrialized countries in the world .
Tanyo yang Golden Gate Bridge nayan .
Tubong nilugaw sila dyan .
Sobrang tagal nang it’s fully paid ....now the toll fee will increase this July 1 from $8.05 to $9.40 .
Tsaka yung water supply ng San Francisco .... susme nineteen kopong kopong pa yung binabayaran nila .
It’s comes from Hetch Hetchy sa Yosemite valley .
Hindi nag increase yung bayad ng local government sa tubig .
Pero yung binabayaran ng mga tao it increased to modern times.
esperasave wrote:Kukay wrote:Mga kupal yang mga baklang Democrats nayan .
Mga bakla na nga eh mga abortionists pa .
Pwe !
I know Democrats all too well .
Mangloloko ang mga yan .
Kunya kunyare eh pro minorities.... na pro illegal immigrants etc etc .
It’s a known fact na mas maraming pina deport na illegal aliens si Obama kesa kay Trump . Yes 2 terms si Obama at one term lang si Trump .... pero mas marami pareng pina deport si Obama kesa kay Trump during his first term .
The only reason why Democrats love illegal immigrants eh because it’s cheap labor .
Labs na labs ng California ang illegal aliens/illegal immigrants kase California is an agricultural state... they love illegal aliens working sa mga vineyards , sa fields .
The agricultural industry ng California will not survive without illegal aliens na super cheap labor.
If you will look at it closely ... it’s slavery all over again na super cheap labor .
Kayo wag maniwala na pro illegal aliens/illegal immigrants ang mga Democrats . They just want cheap labor .
Kamala Harris went to Guatemala and telling them not to come to the US.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57387350
Yang ba ang sinasabe nyong ang mga Democrats eh pro minorities.... na pro illegal immigrants ?
Pro minorities at pro illegal immigrants lang ang mga Democrats pagka its campaign time during election ....pagka naka upo na ang mga yan .. doon lumalabas ang mga tunay na kulay ng mga yan .
Majority of the Latinos voted for Trump .
And it’s no surprise kase Trump helped a lot of Latinos even before he became a president.
May hotels and other businesses si Trump sa Florida and Las Vegas , Nevada.... and he hired a lot of Latinos.
Hindi puro salita at pangako si Trump .
Marami shang tinulungan at tinutulungang Latinos .
He a certified at proven na pro Minorities.
I’m not in anyway saying that squeaky at pristine clean ang mga Republicans.... like I said notoriously na white supremacists ang mga hardcore Republicans... pero in terms sa kawalanghiyaan against minorities eh mas maraming ginawa ang mga democrats kesa sa republicans.
Numbers don’t lie .... mas marami talagang pina deport si Obama kesa kay Trump.
At pede ba ...hindi pa viable ang renewable energy like yang solar energy nayan .
Sobrang mahal magpa install ng solar panels . Not everyone can afford it .
Only the rich can have solar energy .
Hindi pa kayang suportahan ng solar energy ang ano mang state .
Heavily dependent paren ang each and every state sa fossil fuels ... sa gasolina ... sa oil .
Kaya wag maniwala sa mga Democrats na pro environment sila ... na sustainable at viable ang renewable energy ek ek nayan . It’s an empty promise .
It was really shocking when Hillary Clinton said during her presidential campaign that she will abolish coal mining and that she will replace it with solar energy , wind energy ek ek .
Walang basehan ang pinagsasabe nayun ni Hillary Clinton . Dependent paren hanggang ngayon ang America sa coal mining at sobrang dameng American families ang nag de depend sa coal mining .... solar energy/wind energy eh hindi pa viable and sustainable.
Nanloloko lang ang mga Democrats.m
Poster boy ang California ng mga Democrats ... pero wag ka .
The only reason that California is rich is because they heavily tax people and most especially the very rich .
At yung sinasabe nilang yung mga ultra rich lang ang tina target nila .... it’s a lie .
Kahit ordinaryong mga tao they are targeting na ih tax .
They alway put tax increase propositions sa ballot box .... para linis kunsensya sila na it’s the people who decided to increase the tax .... and they sugar coat these tax increase propositions para to get a yes vote ... na kunyare for the benefit of the poor ek ek . Pagka na pass na yun tax increase propositions don molang malalaman na it’s a scam ... it’s really just to increase the tax at super kapirangot na mabe benefit and the poor and needy .
Basta Democrat puro tax tax tax ... at tax increase , tax increase , tax increase ang alam .
And I’m not even exaggerating.
I wish I’m exaggerating but sadly I’m not .
Sobrang yaman na ng California pero ang mga Democrats eh tax paren ng tax .
The California economy eh the sixth largest economy in the world .
It’s like a country sa sobrang yaman ...tinalo pa ang ibang industrialized countries in the world .
Tanyo yang Golden Gate Bridge nayan .
Tubong nilugaw sila dyan .
Sobrang tagal nang it’s fully paid ....now the toll fee will increase this July 1 from $8.05 to $9.40 .
Tsaka yung water supply ng San Francisco .... susme nineteen kopong kopong pa yung binabayaran nila .
It’s comes from Hetch Hetchy sa Yosemite valley .
Hindi nag increase yung bayad ng local government sa tubig .
Pero yung binabayaran ng mga tao it increased to modern times.
We live in THE USA which is a country of 250 nations and territories. There's so many nations involved in this country.
manoypoe wrote:Kukay you have valid point in so many issues, please stop using yellow font coz it is hard to read especially in cp,
Users browsing this forum: uzumaki