chellomellow wrote:Do you really think people will read this with that distracting font? Change it
Kukay wrote:chellomellow wrote:Do you really think people will read this with that distracting font? Change it
It’s one of those things ...
Being a Misso star and all .
I’m very well aware that all haters of mine love reading my posts.
If they reply it a proof that they are indeed reading my posts .... and that they exerting effort to do so .
Ha ha
chellomellow wrote:Kukay wrote:chellomellow wrote:Do you really think people will read this with that distracting font? Change it
It’s one of those things ...
Being a Misso star and all .
I’m very well aware that all haters of mine love reading my posts.
If they reply it a proof that they are indeed reading my posts .... and that they exerting effort to do so .
Ha ha
Bitch! You have no haters. I can guarantee you that
You're not famous like me!
I also highlighted what was posted to understand what was said...
I am PRO LIFE!
Good for the U.S!
esperasave wrote:THE CATHOLICSM HAVE WON TODAY. SINCE THE WORLD RATHER THE UNIVERSE BEGAN, THE PHILOSOPHY OF OUR RELIGION HAS A STRONG STAND ABOUT LIFE AT THE TIME OF CONCEPTION IN ALL STAGE. THAT'S ALREADY THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION. NOTHING COULD CHANGE IT. NO MATTER WHAT THOUGHTS YOU HAVE ABOUT THE ISSUE, ITS TIME FOR YOU TO BELIEVE. NOTHING ELSE YOU CAN DO.
Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:THE CATHOLICSM HAVE WON TODAY. SINCE THE WORLD RATHER THE UNIVERSE BEGAN, THE PHILOSOPHY OF OUR RELIGION HAS A STRONG STAND ABOUT LIFE AT THE TIME OF CONCEPTION IN ALL STAGE. THAT'S ALREADY THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION. NOTHING COULD CHANGE IT. NO MATTER WHAT THOUGHTS YOU HAVE ABOUT THE ISSUE, ITS TIME FOR YOU TO BELIEVE. NOTHING ELSE YOU CAN DO.
Bat Catholics ang tinuturo mo ?
There’s a separation between church and state in the US .
Palibhasa you’re not a citizen and cannot vote .
Anyway ...
Hindi dapat sisihin ang Catholics sa mga kaganapan .
Walang political clout ang Catholics or ano mang denomination sa US politics .
And just so you know ... survival is a human basic instinct .
And yes ... life begins at conception.
It’s not religion saying it but science itself .
esperasave wrote:Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:THE CATHOLICSM HAVE WON TODAY. SINCE THE WORLD RATHER THE UNIVERSE BEGAN, THE PHILOSOPHY OF OUR RELIGION HAS A STRONG STAND ABOUT LIFE AT THE TIME OF CONCEPTION IN ALL STAGE. THAT'S ALREADY THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION. NOTHING COULD CHANGE IT. NO MATTER WHAT THOUGHTS YOU HAVE ABOUT THE ISSUE, ITS TIME FOR YOU TO BELIEVE. NOTHING ELSE YOU CAN DO.
Bat Catholics ang tinuturo mo ?
There’s a separation between church and state in the US .
Palibhasa you’re not a citizen and cannot vote .
Anyway ...
Hindi dapat sisihin ang Catholics sa mga kaganapan .
Walang political clout ang Catholics or ano mang denomination sa US politics .
And just so you know ... survival is a human basic instinct .
And yes ... life begins at conception.
It’s not religion saying it but science itself .
The Catholics were in EVERY STEPS OF THE WAY when The Process was being heard at THE SUPREME COURT. Their patience and resilience paid off so that THE WORLD WOULD NEVER EXPERIENCE DEEP TURMOIL AND TURBELENCE IN ANY PERIOD ON THE HISTORY OF MANKIND ALSO, THEY ARE TACKLING ONE ISSUES AT A TIME TO MAKE SURE THAT SUCCESS WOULD ACHIEVE ON ANY LEGAL OR MORAL DILEMNA. IT'S THE EVIL SCIENCE AND THE PEOPLE WHO WORKS AROUND IT THAT AGGRAVATES THE SITUATIONS WHICH RENDERS EVERYONE PATHETIC, FOOL, STUPID AND IGNORANT.
Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:THE CATHOLICSM HAVE WON TODAY. SINCE THE WORLD RATHER THE UNIVERSE BEGAN, THE PHILOSOPHY OF OUR RELIGION HAS A STRONG STAND ABOUT LIFE AT THE TIME OF CONCEPTION IN ALL STAGE. THAT'S ALREADY THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION. NOTHING COULD CHANGE IT. NO MATTER WHAT THOUGHTS YOU HAVE ABOUT THE ISSUE, ITS TIME FOR YOU TO BELIEVE. NOTHING ELSE YOU CAN DO.
Bat Catholics ang tinuturo mo ?
There’s a separation between church and state in the US .
Palibhasa you’re not a citizen and cannot vote .
Anyway ...
Hindi dapat sisihin ang Catholics sa mga kaganapan .
Walang political clout ang Catholics or ano mang denomination sa US politics .
And just so you know ... survival is a human basic instinct .
And yes ... life begins at conception.
It’s not religion saying it but science itself .
The Catholics were in EVERY STEPS OF THE WAY when The Process was being heard at THE SUPREME COURT. Their patience and resilience paid off so that THE WORLD WOULD NEVER EXPERIENCE DEEP TURMOIL AND TURBELENCE IN ANY PERIOD ON THE HISTORY OF MANKIND ALSO, THEY ARE TACKLING ONE ISSUES AT A TIME TO MAKE SURE THAT SUCCESS WOULD ACHIEVE ON ANY LEGAL OR MORAL DILEMNA. IT'S THE EVIL SCIENCE AND THE PEOPLE WHO WORKS AROUND IT THAT AGGRAVATES THE SITUATIONS WHICH RENDERS EVERYONE PATHETIC, FOOL, STUPID AND IGNORANT.
Well and good if Catholics have influenced the US Supreme Court’s decision about Roe vs Wade case .
Sotomayor is Catholic but she’s a Democrat .
Six of the nine Supreme Court justices are actually Catholics.
It’s their political party’s affiliation that determined the ruling not their religions .
All the Republicans are against abortion and all the Democrat justices were in favor of abortion .
More than anything .... abortion is a political party issue .
Kahit noong noon pa ... abortion is about Republicans vs Democrats .... it’s not Catholics vs what-have-you .
Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:THE CATHOLICSM HAVE WON TODAY. SINCE THE WORLD RATHER THE UNIVERSE BEGAN, THE PHILOSOPHY OF OUR RELIGION HAS A STRONG STAND ABOUT LIFE AT THE TIME OF CONCEPTION IN ALL STAGE. THAT'S ALREADY THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION. NOTHING COULD CHANGE IT. NO MATTER WHAT THOUGHTS YOU HAVE ABOUT THE ISSUE, ITS TIME FOR YOU TO BELIEVE. NOTHING ELSE YOU CAN DO.
Bat Catholics ang tinuturo mo ?
There’s a separation between church and state in the US .
Palibhasa you’re not a citizen and cannot vote .
Anyway ...
Hindi dapat sisihin ang Catholics sa mga kaganapan .
Walang political clout ang Catholics or ano mang denomination sa US politics .
And just so you know ... survival is a human basic instinct .
And yes ... life begins at conception.
It’s not religion saying it but science itself .
The Catholics were in EVERY STEPS OF THE WAY when The Process was being heard at THE SUPREME COURT. Their patience and resilience paid off so that THE WORLD WOULD NEVER EXPERIENCE DEEP TURMOIL AND TURBELENCE IN ANY PERIOD ON THE HISTORY OF MANKIND ALSO, THEY ARE TACKLING ONE ISSUES AT A TIME TO MAKE SURE THAT SUCCESS WOULD ACHIEVE ON ANY LEGAL OR MORAL DILEMNA. IT'S THE EVIL SCIENCE AND THE PEOPLE WHO WORKS AROUND IT THAT AGGRAVATES THE SITUATIONS WHICH RENDERS EVERYONE PATHETIC, FOOL, STUPID AND IGNORANT.
Well and good if Catholics have influenced the US Supreme Court’s decision about Roe vs Wade case .
Sotomayor is Catholic but she’s a Democrat .
Six of the nine Supreme Court justices are actually Catholics.
It’s their political party’s affiliation that determined the ruling not their religions .
All the Republicans are against abortion and all the Democrat justices were in favor of abortion .
More than anything .... abortion is a political party issue .
Kahit noong noon pa ... abortion is about Republicans vs Democrats .... it’s not Catholics vs what-have-you .
esperasave wrote:Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:THE CATHOLICSM HAVE WON TODAY. SINCE THE WORLD RATHER THE UNIVERSE BEGAN, THE PHILOSOPHY OF OUR RELIGION HAS A STRONG STAND ABOUT LIFE AT THE TIME OF CONCEPTION IN ALL STAGE. THAT'S ALREADY THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION. NOTHING COULD CHANGE IT. NO MATTER WHAT THOUGHTS YOU HAVE ABOUT THE ISSUE, ITS TIME FOR YOU TO BELIEVE. NOTHING ELSE YOU CAN DO.
Bat Catholics ang tinuturo mo ?
There’s a separation between church and state in the US .
Palibhasa you’re not a citizen and cannot vote .
Anyway ...
Hindi dapat sisihin ang Catholics sa mga kaganapan .
Walang political clout ang Catholics or ano mang denomination sa US politics .
And just so you know ... survival is a human basic instinct .
And yes ... life begins at conception.
It’s not religion saying it but science itself .
The Catholics were in EVERY STEPS OF THE WAY when The Process was being heard at THE SUPREME COURT. Their patience and resilience paid off so that THE WORLD WOULD NEVER EXPERIENCE DEEP TURMOIL AND TURBELENCE IN ANY PERIOD ON THE HISTORY OF MANKIND ALSO, THEY ARE TACKLING ONE ISSUES AT A TIME TO MAKE SURE THAT SUCCESS WOULD ACHIEVE ON ANY LEGAL OR MORAL DILEMNA. IT'S THE EVIL SCIENCE AND THE PEOPLE WHO WORKS AROUND IT THAT AGGRAVATES THE SITUATIONS WHICH RENDERS EVERYONE PATHETIC, FOOL, STUPID AND IGNORANT.
Well and good if Catholics have influenced the US Supreme Court’s decision about Roe vs Wade case .
Sotomayor is Catholic but she’s a Democrat .
Six of the nine Supreme Court justices are actually Catholics.
It’s their political party’s affiliation that determined the ruling not their religions .
All the Republicans are against abortion and all the Democrat justices were in favor of abortion .
More than anything .... abortion is a political party issue .
Kahit noong noon pa ... abortion is about Republicans vs Democrats .... it’s not Catholics vs what-have-you .
It's not about The Supreme Court Justices that had the decisive ruling about the issue but it was THE COMMUNITY OF CATHOLICS who were in the hearings to demonstrate about abortion to abolish it in the society in legal terms. On the other hand, it is interesting to note that Every prisoner that will be executed in the chambers there would be A CATHOLIC PRIEST or a LAY PERSON to administer Spiritual Prayers on Their Behalf in their last hours.
Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:Kukay wrote:esperasave wrote:THE CATHOLICSM HAVE WON TODAY. SINCE THE WORLD RATHER THE UNIVERSE BEGAN, THE PHILOSOPHY OF OUR RELIGION HAS A STRONG STAND ABOUT LIFE AT THE TIME OF CONCEPTION IN ALL STAGE. THAT'S ALREADY THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION. NOTHING COULD CHANGE IT. NO MATTER WHAT THOUGHTS YOU HAVE ABOUT THE ISSUE, ITS TIME FOR YOU TO BELIEVE. NOTHING ELSE YOU CAN DO.
Bat Catholics ang tinuturo mo ?
There’s a separation between church and state in the US .
Palibhasa you’re not a citizen and cannot vote .
Anyway ...
Hindi dapat sisihin ang Catholics sa mga kaganapan .
Walang political clout ang Catholics or ano mang denomination sa US politics .
And just so you know ... survival is a human basic instinct .
And yes ... life begins at conception.
It’s not religion saying it but science itself .
The Catholics were in EVERY STEPS OF THE WAY when The Process was being heard at THE SUPREME COURT. Their patience and resilience paid off so that THE WORLD WOULD NEVER EXPERIENCE DEEP TURMOIL AND TURBELENCE IN ANY PERIOD ON THE HISTORY OF MANKIND ALSO, THEY ARE TACKLING ONE ISSUES AT A TIME TO MAKE SURE THAT SUCCESS WOULD ACHIEVE ON ANY LEGAL OR MORAL DILEMNA. IT'S THE EVIL SCIENCE AND THE PEOPLE WHO WORKS AROUND IT THAT AGGRAVATES THE SITUATIONS WHICH RENDERS EVERYONE PATHETIC, FOOL, STUPID AND IGNORANT.
Well and good if Catholics have influenced the US Supreme Court’s decision about Roe vs Wade case .
Sotomayor is Catholic but she’s a Democrat .
Six of the nine Supreme Court justices are actually Catholics.
It’s their political party’s affiliation that determined the ruling not their religions .
All the Republicans are against abortion and all the Democrat justices were in favor of abortion .
More than anything .... abortion is a political party issue .
Kahit noong noon pa ... abortion is about Republicans vs Democrats .... it’s not Catholics vs what-have-you .
It's not about The Supreme Court Justices that had the decisive ruling about the issue but it was THE COMMUNITY OF CATHOLICS who were in the hearings to demonstrate about abortion to abolish it in the society in legal terms. On the other hand, it is interesting to note that Every prisoner that will be executed in the chambers there would be A CATHOLIC PRIEST or a LAY PERSON to administer Spiritual Prayers on Their Behalf in their last hours.
Ano ka ?
Supreme Court ang pinag uusapan dito oi !
Mga kano pa ... eh pagka naka amoy ang mga yan ng anomalyang nangyare at na impluwensyahan ang mga judges eh mag tatalak ang mga yan .
Eh yung nag leak lang nga yung draft last month yung planong ih overturn yang Roe vs Wade nayan eh nagkanda gala iti sa galit ang mga Democrats .
Hindi na inpluwensyahan ang mga US Supreme Court justices ng mga Catholics .
Haka haka molang yan .
Kathang isip molang yan .
Bawal na bawal na buyuhin ang mga Supreme Court justices .
FaruqHuda wrote: If you actually took the time to educate yourself, abortion has only been overturned on the federal level, but has been left on the state level to decide if it should be legal or not. Women can still perform abortion up to 24 weeks in blue (predominantly Democrat) states.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-25/ ... /101183262
FaruqHuda wrote: If you actually took the time to educate yourself, abortion has only been overturned on the federal level, but has been left on the state level to decide if it should be legal or not. Women can still perform abortion up to 24 weeks in blue (predominantly Democrat) states.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-25/ ... /101183262
Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote: If you actually took the time to educate yourself, abortion has only been overturned on the federal level, but has been left on the state level to decide if it should be legal or not. Women can still perform abortion up to 24 weeks in blue (predominantly Democrat) states.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-25/ ... /101183262
What do you mean ONLY on the federal level ?
Abortion is now unconstitutional .
The federal government will not fund abortion .
Just imagine if you’re a pregnant teen ... without a job . Who will shoulder the expenses ?
So it all boils down to this : MONEY
Even in a Democrat state ( blue state ) like California ...not everything is free . The health care system is flawed .
There’s no universal health care system in America .
Only rich cities in California can afford free of everything... the so called sanctuary cities .
There’s 3 sources to get money to pay the health coverage bill in the US .
1. Federal government - using Medicare ... so scratch that . Medicare will not fund abortion.
2. State - in California they use Medical . Problem is ... Medical does not pay for everything .
3. City - only rich cities give supplemental health coverage .
This is just an example :
If your hospital bill is $ 5,000 ....you won’t get any money from the Federal government. California will only pay $3,000 .
The City of San Francisco will pay $2,000 .
The fact that abortion is now unconstitutional is a huge deal .
There’s no universal Heath Care system in America .
Even for a Democrat state ( blue state ) ... they have to find a way to make abortion free . They cannot use federal money to finance abortion.
So going back to my question ....
If you’re a pregnant teenager without a job ... who will pay for your abortion ?
If you’re a pregnant teen in Alabama . You have to tell your parents to give you money to go to Massachusetts to have an abortion. The federal government will not pay anything for your abortion . Massachusetts state will not pay for your abortion because you’re from Alabama .I don’t know if Boston is a sanctuary city ... if it’s not ... Boston will not pay for your abortion bill . Essentially if you’re a pregnant teen ... you need rich parents to get an abortion .
The fight for abortion is really about money .
Abortionists want money .
Abortionists want the government to pay for abortion .
Even Democrat states ( blue states ) have problem paying for abortion . Not all cities are rich enough to provide supplemental health coverage .
FaruqHuda wrote:Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote: If you actually took the time to educate yourself, abortion has only been overturned on the federal level, but has been left on the state level to decide if it should be legal or not. Women can still perform abortion up to 24 weeks in blue (predominantly Democrat) states.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-25/ ... /101183262
What do you mean ONLY on the federal level ?
Abortion is now unconstitutional .
The federal government will not fund abortion .
Just imagine if you’re a pregnant teen ... without a job . Who will shoulder the expenses ?
So it all boils down to this : MONEY
Even in a Democrat state ( blue state ) like California ...not everything is free . The health care system is flawed .
There’s no universal health care system in America .
Only rich cities in California can afford free of everything... the so called sanctuary cities .
There’s 3 sources to get money to pay the health coverage bill in the US .
1. Federal government - using Medicare ... so scratch that . Medicare will not fund abortion.
2. State - in California they use Medical . Problem is ... Medical does not pay for everything .
3. City - only rich cities give supplemental health coverage .
This is just an example :
If your hospital bill is $ 5,000 ....you won’t get any money from the Federal government. California will only pay $3,000 .
The City of San Francisco will pay $2,000 .
The fact that abortion is now unconstitutional is a huge deal .
There’s no universal Heath Care system in America .
Even for a Democrat state ( blue state ) ... they have to find a way to make abortion free . They cannot use federal money to finance abortion.
So going back to my question ....
If you’re a pregnant teenager without a job ... who will pay for your abortion ?
If you’re a pregnant teen in Alabama . You have to tell your parents to give you money to go to Massachusetts to have an abortion. The federal government will not pay anything for your abortion . Massachusetts state will not pay for your abortion because you’re from Alabama .I don’t know if Boston is a sanctuary city ... if it’s not ... Boston will not pay for your abortion bill . Essentially if you’re a pregnant teen ... you need rich parents to get an abortion .
The fight for abortion is really about money .
Abortionists want money .
Abortionists want the government to pay for abortion .
Even Democrat states ( blue states ) have problem paying for abortion . Not all cities are rich enough to provide supplemental health coverage .
WRONG. Show me exactly in the US Constitution where it says it is constitutional. The reason why 6 SC justices overturned it because Roe vs. Wade was decided in a rush, and it was never constitutional to begin with. Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg thought that the case was made out of faulty decision.
1. The Right To Abortion, A Constitutional Right?
In short, there is no clear answer when it comes to whether or not the right to an abortion is a constitutional right. The right to an abortion is not mentioned anywhere in the US Constitution. The debate will likely continue for many years to come.
It is also worth noting that many people, including Justice Antonin Scalia, believe that the right to an abortion should not be protected under the Constitution. https://www.womenscenter.com/2022/04/ab ... nal-right/
2. Abortion is not a constitutional right according to a direct reading of the text of the Constitution, but it has been justified as such under the Fourth Amendment’s protection of privacy. In short, the constitutional right to abortion is found not in the Constitution itself, but in a loose reading of it as a “living document,” as “progressives” like to call it. https://www.hli.org/resources/abortion- ... man-right/
3. Legally speaking, the Supreme Court did not ban abortion. The Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson holding “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey must be overruled, and the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to the people and their elected representatives.” https://ktar.com/story/5123287/legally- ... -decision/
4. No, Abortion Isn't a Constitutional Right https://www.realclearpolitics.com/artic ... 0388.html#!
5. Supreme Court leak confirms Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s prescient warning about Roe v. Wade https://nypost.com/2022/05/04/supreme-c ... oe-v-wade/
Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote:Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote: If you actually took the time to educate yourself, abortion has only been overturned on the federal level, but has been left on the state level to decide if it should be legal or not. Women can still perform abortion up to 24 weeks in blue (predominantly Democrat) states.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-25/ ... /101183262
What do you mean ONLY on the federal level ?
Abortion is now unconstitutional .
The federal government will not fund abortion .
Just imagine if you’re a pregnant teen ... without a job . Who will shoulder the expenses ?
So it all boils down to this : MONEY
Even in a Democrat state ( blue state ) like California ...not everything is free . The health care system is flawed .
There’s no universal health care system in America .
Only rich cities in California can afford free of everything... the so called sanctuary cities .
There’s 3 sources to get money to pay the health coverage bill in the US .
1. Federal government - using Medicare ... so scratch that . Medicare will not fund abortion.
2. State - in California they use Medical . Problem is ... Medical does not pay for everything .
3. City - only rich cities give supplemental health coverage .
This is just an example :
If your hospital bill is $ 5,000 ....you won’t get any money from the Federal government. California will only pay $3,000 .
The City of San Francisco will pay $2,000 .
The fact that abortion is now unconstitutional is a huge deal .
There’s no universal Heath Care system in America .
Even for a Democrat state ( blue state ) ... they have to find a way to make abortion free . They cannot use federal money to finance abortion.
So going back to my question ....
If you’re a pregnant teenager without a job ... who will pay for your abortion ?
If you’re a pregnant teen in Alabama . You have to tell your parents to give you money to go to Massachusetts to have an abortion. The federal government will not pay anything for your abortion . Massachusetts state will not pay for your abortion because you’re from Alabama .I don’t know if Boston is a sanctuary city ... if it’s not ... Boston will not pay for your abortion bill . Essentially if you’re a pregnant teen ... you need rich parents to get an abortion .
The fight for abortion is really about money .
Abortionists want money .
Abortionists want the government to pay for abortion .
Even Democrat states ( blue states ) have problem paying for abortion . Not all cities are rich enough to provide supplemental health coverage .
WRONG. Show me exactly in the US Constitution where it says it is constitutional. The reason why 6 SC justices overturned it because Roe vs. Wade was decided in a rush, and it was never constitutional to begin with. Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg thought that the case was made out of faulty decision.
1. The Right To Abortion, A Constitutional Right?
In short, there is no clear answer when it comes to whether or not the right to an abortion is a constitutional right. The right to an abortion is not mentioned anywhere in the US Constitution. The debate will likely continue for many years to come.
It is also worth noting that many people, including Justice Antonin Scalia, believe that the right to an abortion should not be protected under the Constitution. https://www.womenscenter.com/2022/04/ab ... nal-right/
2. Abortion is not a constitutional right according to a direct reading of the text of the Constitution, but it has been justified as such under the Fourth Amendment’s protection of privacy. In short, the constitutional right to abortion is found not in the Constitution itself, but in a loose reading of it as a “living document,” as “progressives” like to call it. https://www.hli.org/resources/abortion- ... man-right/
3. Legally speaking, the Supreme Court did not ban abortion. The Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson holding “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey must be overruled, and the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to the people and their elected representatives.” https://ktar.com/story/5123287/legally- ... -decision/
4. No, Abortion Isn't a Constitutional Right https://www.realclearpolitics.com/artic ... 0388.html#!
5. Supreme Court leak confirms Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s prescient warning about Roe v. Wade https://nypost.com/2022/05/04/supreme-c ... oe-v-wade/
Ha ha
Your googling skill is hilarious .
It’s so easy now to google stuff that abortion is unconstitutional because the judges already handed out their decision .
But before it wasn’t because of that freak’n Roe vs Wade .
And it’s pretty obvious you don’t know anything about legal matters .
The contention really is the INTERPRETATION of the laws ... and in this case the INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.
And US Supreme Court judge Brett Kavanaugh wrote in his decision that the US Constitution never protected nor trashed abortion .Simply put ... abortion was never part of the constitution.
That evil Roe vs Wade makes people think that abortion is constitutional but it was all thinly veiled .
Now that abortion is officially unconstitutional... they cannot ask the federal government for money to fund anything related to abortion .
And they cannot misappropriate funds and funnel money to support abortion . That’s against the law . Ha ha
Your blue states ( Democrat states ) have to find ways to support your abortion.
Not all blue states and cities are rich .... not everybody can finance abortion . That’s just the reality .
The federal government is the richest source of money... now you abortionists have a huge humongous gargantuan problem .
Ha ha
FaruqHuda wrote:Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote:Kukay wrote:FaruqHuda wrote: If you actually took the time to educate yourself, abortion has only been overturned on the federal level, but has been left on the state level to decide if it should be legal or not. Women can still perform abortion up to 24 weeks in blue (predominantly Democrat) states.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-25/ ... /101183262
What do you mean ONLY on the federal level ?
Abortion is now unconstitutional .
The federal government will not fund abortion .
Just imagine if you’re a pregnant teen ... without a job . Who will shoulder the expenses ?
So it all boils down to this : MONEY
Even in a Democrat state ( blue state ) like California ...not everything is free . The health care system is flawed .
There’s no universal health care system in America .
Only rich cities in California can afford free of everything... the so called sanctuary cities .
There’s 3 sources to get money to pay the health coverage bill in the US .
1. Federal government - using Medicare ... so scratch that . Medicare will not fund abortion.
2. State - in California they use Medical . Problem is ... Medical does not pay for everything .
3. City - only rich cities give supplemental health coverage .
This is just an example :
If your hospital bill is $ 5,000 ....you won’t get any money from the Federal government. California will only pay $3,000 .
The City of San Francisco will pay $2,000 .
The fact that abortion is now unconstitutional is a huge deal .
There’s no universal Heath Care system in America .
Even for a Democrat state ( blue state ) ... they have to find a way to make abortion free . They cannot use federal money to finance abortion.
So going back to my question ....
If you’re a pregnant teenager without a job ... who will pay for your abortion ?
If you’re a pregnant teen in Alabama . You have to tell your parents to give you money to go to Massachusetts to have an abortion. The federal government will not pay anything for your abortion . Massachusetts state will not pay for your abortion because you’re from Alabama .I don’t know if Boston is a sanctuary city ... if it’s not ... Boston will not pay for your abortion bill . Essentially if you’re a pregnant teen ... you need rich parents to get an abortion .
The fight for abortion is really about money .
Abortionists want money .
Abortionists want the government to pay for abortion .
Even Democrat states ( blue states ) have problem paying for abortion . Not all cities are rich enough to provide supplemental health coverage .
WRONG. Show me exactly in the US Constitution where it says it is constitutional. The reason why 6 SC justices overturned it because Roe vs. Wade was decided in a rush, and it was never constitutional to begin with. Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg thought that the case was made out of faulty decision.
1. The Right To Abortion, A Constitutional Right?
In short, there is no clear answer when it comes to whether or not the right to an abortion is a constitutional right. The right to an abortion is not mentioned anywhere in the US Constitution. The debate will likely continue for many years to come.
It is also worth noting that many people, including Justice Antonin Scalia, believe that the right to an abortion should not be protected under the Constitution. https://www.womenscenter.com/2022/04/ab ... nal-right/
2. Abortion is not a constitutional right according to a direct reading of the text of the Constitution, but it has been justified as such under the Fourth Amendment’s protection of privacy. In short, the constitutional right to abortion is found not in the Constitution itself, but in a loose reading of it as a “living document,” as “progressives” like to call it. https://www.hli.org/resources/abortion- ... man-right/
3. Legally speaking, the Supreme Court did not ban abortion. The Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson holding “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey must be overruled, and the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to the people and their elected representatives.” https://ktar.com/story/5123287/legally- ... -decision/
4. No, Abortion Isn't a Constitutional Right https://www.realclearpolitics.com/artic ... 0388.html#!
5. Supreme Court leak confirms Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s prescient warning about Roe v. Wade https://nypost.com/2022/05/04/supreme-c ... oe-v-wade/
Ha ha
Your googling skill is hilarious .
It’s so easy now to google stuff that abortion is unconstitutional because the judges already handed out their decision .
But before it wasn’t because of that freak’n Roe vs Wade .
And it’s pretty obvious you don’t know anything about legal matters .
The contention really is the INTERPRETATION of the laws ... and in this case the INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.
And US Supreme Court judge Brett Kavanaugh wrote in his decision that the US Constitution never protected nor trashed abortion .Simply put ... abortion was never part of the constitution.
That evil Roe vs Wade makes people think that abortion is constitutional but it was all thinly veiled .
Now that abortion is officially unconstitutional... they cannot ask the federal government for money to fund anything related to abortion .
And they cannot misappropriate funds and funnel money to support abortion . That’s against the law . Ha ha
Your blue states ( Democrat states ) have to find ways to support your abortion.
Not all blue states and cities are rich .... not everybody can finance abortion . That’s just the reality .
The federal government is the richest source of money... now you abortionists have a huge humongous gargantuan problem .
Ha ha
Dude, I am against abortion, so don't call me an abortionist.
AGAIN- Abortion IS AND HAS NEVER BEEN CONSTITUTIONAL. You know zero about how the US Constitution works, or how the SCOTUS interprets it. Also, you're talking from both sides of your mouth. I'm not sure whether you're pro-life or pro-choice, or whether or not you disagree with SCOTUS's decision to outlaw abortion on the federal level. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution outlines the enumerated powers and abortion is not there. Therefore, you go to the 9th and 10th Amendments to learn the process for allowing abortions or disallowing abortions in each state. SCOTUS originally overstepped its boundaries when it ruled on Roe back in 1973. The 10th Amendment is specific. What is not mentioned in Constitution shall be left to the states to decide. The Justices are there to rule on constitutionality of a case - not legislate from the bench. For whatever reason, way too many people like yourself are of the misguided understanding that the leaked court opinion outlaws abortion - it doesn't at all. It allows each state to either outlaw it or not. But I have to give you credit for stating that it's all about money. This is the reason why Planned Parenthood is panicking because they will no longer receive federal funding for abortions.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users