How about you? Do you still trust this pageant?
the critic wrote:OVER 130 FRANCHISE HOLDERS FROM AROUND THE GLOBE AND THOUSANDS OF BEAUTIFUL WOMEN TRUST IT TO INVEST IN IT ANUALLY, SPONSORS, PARTNERS AND CHARITY DONERS AS WELL...SO WHAT SAYS RANDOM MEMBERS ON MISSOSOLOGY WHO ARE JUST SPECTATORS?
iamkenmotion wrote:the critic wrote:OVER 130 FRANCHISE HOLDERS FROM AROUND THE GLOBE AND THOUSANDS OF BEAUTIFUL WOMEN TRUST IT TO INVEST IN IT ANUALLY, SPONSORS, PARTNERS AND CHARITY DONERS AS WELL...SO WHAT SAYS RANDOM MEMBERS ON MISSOSOLOGY WHO ARE JUST SPECTATORS?Hi DUMMY! The poll is for MISSOSOLOGY FORUMERS! GOT THAT? TO RAISE A DISCUSSION BETWEEN FORUMERS. I AM NOT ASKING ABOUT THE FRANCHISE HOLDERS, PARTNERS AND CHARITY DONORS OPINIONS. You DUMB?
ajsy0203 wrote:Since 2010 only 4 former Miss World contestants later placed at Miss Universe: Yendi Philips, Patricia Rodriguez, Olivia Jordan and Flora Coquerel. All 4 of them finished in the top 5. Also since 2010 most of the former Miss World placers ended up as clappers at Miss Universe like Deborah Henry, Gabrielle Walcott, Nathalie Den Dekker (who later finished 1st Runner Up at Miss International 2013) and others. One forumer said before that most of the MW contestants allegedly has a bigger chance to be a clapper at Miss Universe.
So the problematic judging system of the pageant prevented some people to trust Miss World again.
Let's see if Rafieya can pull a superb performance at 66th Miss Universe or will she fall into a clapper?
Obaa Lizzie wrote:My answer to the poll is I trust the election of the winner, selection of finalists and runner ups have been questionable these past few years, there is only one winner in the history of Miss World whom I think did not deserve it and as years goes by she proves me right but I do not trust their charity claim. They spend all the money on travels expenses and bill it as charity. Last year when Washington Post asked them they struggled to come up with a decent explanation.
Obaa Lizzie wrote:Are we really asking what Miss World winners have in common? They all look like doppelgangers. When Rolene took that selfie with Stephanie in SA she looked like her actual younger sister. Even Stephanie's mother agreed. They all have in built class and are elegant.
Atoy wrote:no! even if they crown another Filipina in the next 3 years. after last edition i honestly think deserving winners are left out like Ms Philippines Catriona Gray for the sake of business and pleasing national directors. Indonesia and Puerto Rico were the biggest joke . The Most honest least bias pageant I know is Miss International
Stoichio wrote:Obaa Lizzie wrote:My answer to the poll is I trust the election of the winner, selection of finalists and runner ups have been questionable these past few years, there is only one winner in the history of Miss World whom I think did not deserve it and as years goes by she proves me right but I do not trust their charity claim. They spend all the money on travels expenses and bill it as charity. Last year when Washington Post asked them they struggled to come up with a decent explanation.
See, even you distrust a chunk of the contest.
Now, you should name names or else, you are just creating your own speculations.
MW is never consistent: From 2012 to 2015, they displayed the scores. Then suddenly, they eliminated that scoresheet last year. So, don't blame if people suddenly question them.
the critic wrote:OVER 130 FRANCHISE HOLDERS FROM AROUND THE GLOBE AND THOUSANDS OF BEAUTIFUL WOMEN TRUST IT TO INVEST IN IT ANUALLY, SPONSORS, PARTNERS AND CHARITY DONERS AS WELL...SO WHAT SAYS RANDOM MEMBERS ON MISSOSOLOGY WHO ARE JUST SPECTATORS?
sharronstoned wrote:Only TWO people on this site have complete faith in Miss World: Lucy and Nina Cleopatra.
Everyone else is just an alternick of the moderator that operates the account of the latter.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users