
The LED screens at the back blew me away










SayA wrote:i hope they can also make the whole format and production better, not boring like the past years.





koalgreg wrote:Plus Miss Morley is on Missosology. Trump you got allot of work to do to catch up![]()
![]()
![]()














van1k2 wrote:Angela Chow's new playground looks good.








van1k2 wrote:Angela Chow's new playground looks good.


mamaevangeline wrote:SayA wrote:i hope they can also make the whole format and production better, not boring like the past years.
DITTO, bro.
my concern is the stage is so big,
it would surely affect the pace of the candidates..
it might be slow and boring. HOPE NOT.












sleuth08 wrote:the stage is big and beautiful - but there's nothing in the design that says Ordos, Mongolia.
I guess that's the reason why Miss Universe Stage is still better because just by the stage you know which country is hosting.


moon gin wrote:sleuth08 wrote:the stage is big and beautiful - but there's nothing in the design that says Ordos, Mongolia.
I guess that's the reason why Miss Universe Stage is still better because just by the stage you know which country is hosting.
Really? How about MU 2009 in Bahamas? Does anything in the stage screams Bahamas .... ???


sleuth08 wrote:so the bahamas is an exception. 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2011 - the list goes on and on how the Miss Universe stage is still better


moon gin wrote:sleuth08 wrote:so the bahamas is an exception. 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2011 - the list goes on and on how the Miss Universe stage is still better
Well that said MU stage is not always better than MW. In some years it is better than MW, but in other years, MW beat MU.


sleuth08 wrote:moon gin wrote:sleuth08 wrote:so the bahamas is an exception. 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2011 - the list goes on and on how the Miss Universe stage is still better
Well that said MU stage is not always better than MW. In some years it is better than MW, but in other years, MW beat MU.
the only time MW stage is better than MU was in 1998 and 2009 - so thats 2 out of many years the MU stage is better


sleuth08 wrote:moon gin wrote:sleuth08 wrote:so the bahamas is an exception. 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2011 - the list goes on and on how the Miss Universe stage is still better
Well that said MU stage is not always better than MW. In some years it is better than MW, but in other years, MW beat MU.
the only time MW stage is better than MU was in 1998 and 2009 - so thats 2 out of many years the MU stage is better


moon gin wrote:sleuth08 wrote:moon gin wrote:sleuth08 wrote:so the bahamas is an exception. 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2011 - the list goes on and on how the Miss Universe stage is still better
Well that said MU stage is not always better than MW. In some years it is better than MW, but in other years, MW beat MU.
the only time MW stage is better than MU was in 1998 and 2009 - so thats 2 out of many years the MU stage is better
I would say 1998, 1999, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2010 MW stages are better than MU.
And looking at 2012 stage seems like MW stage will beat MU big time


moon gin wrote:sleuth08 wrote:moon gin wrote:sleuth08 wrote:so the bahamas is an exception. 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2011 - the list goes on and on how the Miss Universe stage is still better
Well that said MU stage is not always better than MW. In some years it is better than MW, but in other years, MW beat MU.
the only time MW stage is better than MU was in 1998 and 2009 - so thats 2 out of many years the MU stage is better
I would say 1998, 1999, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2010 MW stages are better than MU.
And looking at 2012 stage seems like MW stage will beat MU big time


Users browsing this forum: 2Rahtid, Maricel and 22 guests