Virginia Dalisay wrote:Lessons learned:
Dont be complacent and depend much on sash factor. Give all you've got even in preliminary competition.![]()
![]()
markita wrote:Considering that argument, why did Laos, Canada, and T&T receive spots despite their underwhelming performances?
I think it was premeditated. Ann's questionable leadership led to MUO excluding PH for whatever reason. PH and THAI were the sacrificial lambs in the end.
Neeva wrote:Did they announce who the fan vote winner was? I think pinoys were complacent too
not voting enough for her, thinking she was a shoo in.
Virginia Dalisay wrote:I cant believe this.
Canada, Laos, Haiti, T&T in top 16 while Philippines is not included? Really!!!
wingsofnightingale wrote:markita wrote:Considering that argument, why did Laos, Canada, and T&T receive spots despite their underwhelming performances?
I think it was premeditated. Ann's questionable leadership led to MUO excluding PH for whatever reason. PH and THAI were the sacrificial lambs in the end.
Laos I believe is fan vote.
Canada and TnT had strong advocacies plus they are very eloquent speakers which Celeste is NOT.
renegade wrote:So Thailand, Vietnam dont have advocacies as well? And Indonesia is a good communicator.
wingsofnightingale wrote:renegade wrote:So Thailand, Vietnam dont have advocacies as well? And Indonesia is a good communicator.
Thailand looks weird in all her make up. She needs to first close her mouth.
Vietnam is a poor speaker.
Indonesia... nevermind.
wingsofnightingale wrote:renegade wrote:So Thailand, Vietnam dont have advocacies as well? And Indonesia is a good communicator.
Thailand looks weird in all her make up. She needs to first close her mouth.
Vietnam is a poor speaker.
Indonesia... nevermind.
renegade wrote:wingsofnightingale wrote:renegade wrote:So Thailand, Vietnam dont have advocacies as well? And Indonesia is a good communicator.
Thailand looks weird in all her make up. She needs to first close her mouth.
Vietnam is a poor speaker.
Indonesia... nevermind.
They said Peru is a poor speaker. What was her advocacy?
Elif87 wrote:Sometimes a contestant forgets;
No judge needs to have a preparation for their duty.
So therefore the only place that they actually see and score you are;
the closed door interviews and the prelims
Which determines your faith
Maybe a few files the org hands over to them, like the bg of the girls, their causes etc
So if you play it safe in the prelims and if the interview is plain plus no strong cause, then you might be out
markita wrote:Considering that argument, why did Laos, Canada, and T&T receive spots despite their underwhelming performances?
I think it was premeditated. Ann's questionable leadership led to MUO excluding PH for whatever reason. PH and THAI were the sacrificial lambs in the end.
wingsofnightingale wrote:renegade wrote:So Thailand, Vietnam dont have advocacies as well? And Indonesia is a good communicator.
Thailand looks weird in all her make up. She needs to first close her mouth.
Vietnam is a poor speaker.
Indonesia... nevermind.
Users browsing this forum: Arctic Fox, beingjonan, eugene69ph, Fany, fortela, Google [Bot], habihabi, Ian Sebastin, IwanSetiawan, JimCricy, onin7215, red*bird35