Page 1 of 1

MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:09 am
by ajsy0203


What is your reaction?

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:32 am
by HardlineWreck
This is the evidence that they are NOT PROFESSIONALS. It screams CHEAPNESS and their REPUTATION GOING DOWN TO THE GUTTER HAHA
I can't believe that they put that reaction thru their soc med lol, they are so desperate to the core. Why are they fighting a pageant forum in the first place?

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:35 am
by esperasave
MGI is in The Public View and domain so the consent is implied. They have already been putting themselves to the mainstream. Why each and everyone of us would ask their consent? They will be flooded asking consent after consent from The Viewers or Followers of their organization. Furthermore, you can't single out anyone from viewership when you broadcast your live TELECAST from Facebook, TV PROGRAMS and other social media. Your face is always there eventhough we didn't ask for and why we can't watch or react with you. This is just being crazy, cookoo and loco.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 11:44 am
by ajsy0203
Additional Story:

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 2:11 pm
by kurtij
THIS GETS BORING.

REALLY THE CHEAPEST.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 3:44 pm
by sleuth08
IF THAT'S WHAT THEY WANT, SO BE IT.

REMOVE THE PHOTOS, THE THREAD EVEN THE TOPICS.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 4:23 pm
by vinusya
LOL HE IS CRAZY

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Thu Aug 25, 2022 8:17 pm
by manoypoe
Cheapness at its best. Even their statement is full of grammatical errors and the way it is constructed is not even professional. What kind of organization is this? Those who still subscribe to this pageant is as cheap as the org. =O/ =O/

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2022 1:04 am
by beautywatchnyc

Is this even legit? Has the source been verified or validated? Or, are some respondents merely ganged up with sheer gullibility to shower this level of attention that is much undeserved?

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2022 6:10 am
by blunderer

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2022 11:59 am
by Prozac
ajsy0203 wrote:

What is your reaction?


Just who do they think they are? This is the first time I heard somebody threatening another with a lawsuit
just for the fun of it.

Are you ready Misso? Let's give them what they want. Remove any write-up about the organization and its
winners. Let's give them the news black-out that they wanted.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2022 6:05 pm
by FaruqHuda
manoypoe wrote:Cheapness at its best. Even their statement is full of grammatical errors and the way it is constructed is not even professional. What kind of organization is this? Those who still subscribe to this pageant is as cheap as the org. =O/ =O/


You should pay to your own grammatical error before criticizing others for theirs.

Those who still subscribe to this pageant ARE as cheap as the org.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2022 7:53 pm
by manoypoe
FaruqHuda wrote:
manoypoe wrote:Cheapness at its best. Even their statement is full of grammatical errors and the way it is constructed is not even professional. What kind of organization is this? Those who still subscribe to this pageant is as cheap as the org. =O/ =O/


You should pay to your own grammatical error before criticizing others for theirs.

Those who still subscribe to this pageant ARE as cheap as the org.


No issues with me coz I am not an organization. I am only representing myself and my grammatical error is not that glaring. My bad for not proofreading my posts and I am sorry for that, is that acceptable? :-* :-*

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 3:39 am
by ajsy0203
beautywatchnyc wrote:
Is this even legit? Has the source been verified or validated? Or, are some respondents merely ganged up with sheer gullibility to shower this level of attention that is much undeserved?


Original Post:


MGI's Response: (I don't know if Nawat typed that response or he called his Social Media Team to post their response vs Missosology)

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 5:14 am
by beautywatchnyc

That's exactly what I mean ajsy0203! You cannot even confirm whether or not it was Nawat himself who typed and posted the warning neither can you confirm if it was his work team or who among his close associates posted this controversial warning. Yet you proceeded to entice the fora under a cloud of doubt and your respondents to react (some of them quite strongly) providing the gullible among them with a fodder of an unverified post for whichever "maritess" you may cuddle I'm at a loss and entirely clueless. Can you imagine the repercussions if what you may have posted may not actually be true or without verifiable basis at all?

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 8:03 am
by manoypoe
beautywatchnyc wrote:
That's exactly what I mean ajsy0203! You cannot even confirm whether or not it was Nawat himself who typed and posted the warning neither can you confirm if it was his work team or who among his close associates posted this controversial warning. Yet you proceeded to entice the fora under a cloud of doubt and your respondents to react (some of them quite strongly) providing the gullible among them with a fodder of an unverified post for whichever "maritess" you may cuddle I'm at a loss and entirely clueless. Can you imagine the repercussions if what you may have posted may not actually be true or without verifiable basis at all?


The reply was from the verified org account, I believe. So whoever posted it, whether Nawat or his ilk, the statement comes from the org itself with Nawat's approval.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 8:18 am
by ajsy0203
beautywatchnyc wrote:
That's exactly what I mean ajsy0203! You cannot even confirm whether or not it was Nawat himself who typed and posted the warning neither can you confirm if it was his work team or who among his close associates posted this controversial warning. Yet you proceeded to entice the fora under a cloud of doubt and your respondents to react (some of them quite strongly) providing the gullible among them with a fodder of an unverified post for whichever "maritess" you may cuddle I'm at a loss and entirely clueless. Can you imagine the repercussions if what you may have posted may not actually be true or without verifiable basis at all?


The response is from the verified and official social media account of MGI and even Pawee responded that MGI's tirade against Missosology with "Bring it on, sister". Who could type this response when Nawat was in Malaysia at that time of the response vs Missosology?

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 8:23 am
by ajsy0203
Pawee's Response vs Nawat & MGI Org.:
Image

A day after that incident, MJ Lastimosa has a live chat with Nawat but it did not bring the issue about his pageant vs Missosology's FB post.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 9:17 am
by Prozac
ajsy0203 wrote:Pawee's Response vs Nawat & MGI Org.:
Image

A day after that incident, MJ Lastimosa has a live chat with Nawat but it did not bring the issue about his pageant vs Missosology's FB post.



In an interview with MJ Lastimosa last night thru KUMU, Miss Gwand International President & owner Mr. Nawat Itsaragrisil
said that "Grand" title is leaving Bb. Pilipinas next year and will offer the franchise to other organizations if Bb. Pilipinas
will not hold a separate and sole pageant for the title.

That was quite a demand. By the way, is he making this demand to the Philippines only, or is this now a blanket policy to
all Miss Gr@and franchisees all over the world?


Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 10:13 am
by ajsy0203
Prozac wrote:
ajsy0203 wrote:Pawee's Response vs Nawat & MGI Org.:
Image

A day after that incident, MJ Lastimosa has a live chat with Nawat but it did not bring the issue about his pageant vs Missosology's FB post.



In an interview with MJ Lastimosa last night thru KUMU, Miss Gwand International President & owner Mr. Nawat Itsaragrisil
said that "Grand" title is leaving Bb. Pilipinas next year and will offer the franchise to other organizations if Bb. Pilipinas
will not hold a separate and sole pageant for the title.

That was quite a demand. By the way, is he making this demand to the Philippines only, or is this now a blanket policy to
all Miss Gr@and franchisees all over the world?



Miss World Organization tried to do this demand in 2012 but most of the countries with MW franchise are still crowning multiple national titleholders including Philippines.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 3:35 pm
by kurtij
MGI AND GLOBALTITTIES ARE WORKING TOGETHER AGAINST MISSOSOLOGY.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 11:33 pm
by beautywatchnyc
Lahat na ganaps at galawans for or against this Org translate to publicity. Be that as it may, like it or not, these all are fodder to the man's ego.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 11:38 pm
by esperasave
kurtij wrote:MGI AND GLOBALTITTIES ARE WORKING TOGETHER AGAINST MISSOSOLOGY.


They can't bring down THE SUPREMACY OF THE PHILIPPINE'S BEAUTY PAGEANTRY ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES INTERNATIONALLY. Not even MUO OR MWO could tear us. BWAHAHAHAHA. LOL.

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2022 3:58 pm
by arc
ajsy0203 wrote:

What is your reaction?


The audacity of the Miss Universe copycat pageant :-@ :-@ :-@

Re: MGI Org. vs Missosology for the nth time

PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2022 11:12 pm
by beautywatchnyc

Stylish deception ... or, clever fake???? Publicity, however, it is stated or taken is still publicity!!!!