Forum rules
Welcome to Missosology! Semi-offensive and 'mild/moderate bashings' ALLOWED to stir Liveliness, Fun and Entertainment BUT 1. NO CROSSING LIMITS as DIRECT RACIST REMARKS, NUDE OR VIOLENT PICS. 2. NO SPAMMING/FLOODING 3. NO ADVERTISING. 4. NO VIOLATING/DIVULGING PRIVACY/personal infos of members as posting their pic/real name without their consent. 5. ONLY Pageants and Members' related stuffs in the General Section, for other stuffs, go to the Chit Chat Lounge. HAVE FUN!
It is selected and discussed by top purely top BEAUTY EXPERTS of Missosology. However ONLY 'GODDESSES' are selected, NOT EVEN 'SUPER BEAUTIES' but compared to TIMELESS BEAUTY it includes all contestants from National and International pageants, even those who didn't even place in their National Beauty Pageant and were just normal contestants who were not even runner ups AS LONG AS THEY LOOK LIKE REAL GODDESSES.
MISSOSOLOGY'S TIMELESS BEAUTY
This one includes all Goddesses, Super Beauties and even some PLAIN JANES who are being nominated as 'TIMELESS'. Not to mention the MAJOR DISASTER RESULTS in the past due to polling which severely damaged and ramshackled the entire reputation of Missosology. However they all should have been a candidate on the International level. Now we no more do polling but selects judges from all corners of the world from the World Beauty Council however these individuals not all have a good taste and an eye for beauty. The result has come out FAIRLY GOOD with Irene Esser who is very beautiful and a SUPER BEAUTY, however she is not perfect compared to the 'GODDESS' Sophie Moulds.
2 QUESTIONS:
1.Do you prefer 'GODDESS OF BEAUTY' or 'TIMELESS BEAUTY'?
2.Should 'TIMELESS BEAUTY' be made up of random individuals or exclusively BEAUTY EXPERTS'?
TIMELESS BEAUTY! Beauty fades, but your impact to the world of pageantry will live on forever. So I prefer this.
In my humble opinion, the panel of timeless beauties of Missosology should consist of pageant experts, beauty experts, fashion experts, pageant historians and representatives from each of the tags in Missosology. It is not only beauty that makes a girl "timeless". Her inimitable charm, wit, manner of carrying dress, body, and other factors in pageantry that make her timeless.
♫ Treasure, that is what you are. Honey, you're my golden star. You know you can make my wish come true if you let me treasure you. ♫
The first category is bordering on elitism. It cannot be denied that Missosology is a melting pot of views, perspectives, and prejudices on beauty pageants. We cannot take away the pageant from beauty, much less beauty from pageants. This site could just have been a beauty site--not my sole reason for entering this helluva wonderful and beautiful world. But yes, I would enjoy beauty experts' presentation of the Goddesses of Beauty. Aesthetic, for me.
Well, I have reservations for Timeless Beauty. I can relate to Granny my loves--the idea of women with timeless beauty is very abstract. It is just floating in the air. What may be timeless for me, may be not for others. Just my thoughts.
This is perhaps beauty law versus an experimental system, the results of which would not verily satisfy the taste of other forumers or virtually represent the abstract concept of a timeless beauty.
On a personal level, my vote goes to Goddess of Beauty.
Not to mention the MAJOR DISASTER RESULTS in the past due to polling which severely damaged and ramshackled the entire reputation of Missosology. 
However they all should have been a candidate on the International level. Now we no more do polling but selects judges from all corners of the world from the World Beauty Council however these individuals not all have a good taste and an eye for beauty. The result has come out FAIRLY GOOD with Irene Esser who is very beautiful and a SUPER BEAUTY, however she is not perfect compared to the 'GODDESS' Sophie Moulds.
